Powder & Bulk Solids is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cereal_Bowl_FORTRESS_TECHNOLOGY.jpg Image courtesy of Fortress Technology Ltd

Quality Checking Packaged Products

When used together, metal detectors and x-ray machines are a formidable force on the production line.

Metal detectors and x-ray machines both have a place on the production line. When used together, they’re a formidable force. This article will explain how they work and why different packaging types and products can affect their performance.

With a metal detector, metals that have one or both conductive magnetic characteristics, such as brass, bronze, ferrous metals, etc., will create a detectable signal. Non-magnetic stainless steel is harder to pick up; it’s a bad conductor and certain food products with added iron, moisture, salt, and acids, tend to mask metal detection. Known as the ‘product effect,’ this can impact inspection performance.

Technological Advancement
Technology has, however, moved forward and detectors are now suited to wet and dry applications. Even conductive products consistently presented in small packaging will be picked up.

With an x-ray machine, light waves pass through the product to be inspected. Anything very dense will block the waves. Yet, low-density materials, such as wood, feathers, bugs, some stones/glass, magnesium, and aluminum, allow the light waves to pass straight through.

When working together, the x-ray machine will favor an in-line inspection position, while the metal detector is better at the end-of-the-line, typically where products have been packaged. Gravity systems are the one exception for in-line processing, as the products move through the machine at such a fast speed this type of application doesn’t lend itself well to x-ray detection.

X-ray machines are getting better, but they’re typically limited to 250 ft (around 75 m) per minute. A gravity application has products passing through at some 800-1500 ft/min (over 450 m), so at that point the metal detector is the best performer.

Products and their packaging clearly affect detectability. A metal detector was, until quite recently, limited in how it performs on products with added iron and any salt/moisture. Manufacturers of ‘wet’ products often had little choice but to calibrate their metal detection in a way that reduced margins of error. The consequence of this was it tended to trigger excessive numbers of false positive rejects.  Simultaneous multi-frequency scanning now makes it much easier for food manufacturers to identify hard-to-find metals in food products with high conductivity, as it’s able to ‘tune-out’ the product effect.

Products that differ in density can impact an x-ray machine’s performance. Although it can be calibrated for the product’s total density, cereal ingredients--raisins, and bran for example--have variable densities. Speckles of raisin will be quite high, the bran low, and the box they’re in, the same density. As the x-ray is measuring the total density, if there’s a contaminant in the box and the machine lands on a low-density bran flake, it may not detect the sample in the same way it would when landing on a higher-density raisin.

When it comes to packaging, recycled cardboard can cause issues for both machines. This cardboard tends to contain ferrous and non-ferrous contaminates, particularly aluminum foil - a big contaminant which an x-ray will overlook- and staples.

Both machines have potential bonus features for specific products and packaging. A metal detector offers ‘reverse detection.’ A cereal box for example, may have a toy that quite often is identified by a metalized filmstrip. The detector will ensure the toy is there, acknowledging the strip while inspecting for other metals. Similarly, it can ensure oxygen absorbers are packed into meat products while detecting metal contaminants.

An x-ray has even more potential--it can look for missing components; for example missing ingredients in ready meals or identify a broken or mis-packaged product. 

Conclusion
Both a metal detector and x-ray machine work well together, but the metal detector should be the critical control point on the line and the x-ray machine a bonus.

Steve Gidman is president, Fortress Technology Inc. A privately-owned Toronto-based company, Fortress Technology Inc. is a metal detection manufacturer that custom manufactures metal detectors to customers’ needs, application, and specification, while ensuring optimal performance. Fortress is a global enterprise providing worldwide coverage from its manufacturing facilities in Canada, the UK, and Brazil. For more information, visit www.fortresstechnology.com.

Hide comments
account-default-image

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish